🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is seeking damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a direct warning from the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory actions, such as confiscating European corporate assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if such assets can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are developing measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European entities. They are also designing protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."