🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has developed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to remove African American heritage and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is mere awareness of the history when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is necessary – Black History is Now Month.